Friday, March 9, 2007

WILD HOGS (2007)

Walt Becker .... Director

Brad Copeland .... Screenwriter

Tim Allen - Doug Madsen
John Travolta - Woody Stevens
Martin Lawrence - Bobby Davis
William H Macy - Dudley Frank
Ray Liotta - Jack
Marisa Tomei - Maggie
Peter Fonda - Damien Blade
Ty Pennington - Himself

Wild Hogs is the slap-stick, road-trip comedy about four middle aged men, each saddled with fears and stress that have arisen from their jobs and families, who decide to saddle up their Harley's for a cross-country road trip to escape the fears and frustrations that have bogged down their life. Doug is an over stressed, workaholic with a less than perfect relationship with his wife and son. Woody is married to a super model who's left him, and his business affairs have unraveled to the point of bankruptcy. Bobby is married to a woman who has decided to wear the pants in their family, only because Bobby won't. And Dudley, a computer nerd, is so preoccupied with the artificial world of computers that he's lost touch with the real world, and especially women, whom he cannot talk to.

(Gus pointed out during our radio show that in this movie Tim Allen got to play across from a Woody again with some of the same attitudes. Allen who voiced Buzz Lightyear in TOY STORY (Disney/Pixar 1995, 1999), played across from a toy cowboy named Woody (voiced by Tom Hanks).

As the four prepare for the open road, they give up their cell phones and GPS locators in a slapstick ritual of angst, and then head off down the road to parts unknown, willing to let their wilderness experience bring something good, true, and beautiful back into their lives.

Like many other pastimes, strapping on a bike and riding across country with the wind in your face, occasional bugs in the eye, and an occasional crow in the mouth, is like going on a spiritual retreat. (Really??? Ah, yeah.) They are about confronting our fears, reconnecting with our soul, with God, with nature, with friends and brining balance and perspective back into our lives. It's not unlike what Lent is supposed to do.

As WILD HOGS unfolds, and the true antagonists are introduced, our four riding buddies discover the importance of confronting our fears, going to confession, being humbled, and sacrificially standing together against injustice.

The morning after watching the movie, my wife, Pam picked up a copy of The Michigan Catholic, the weekly paper form the Archdiocese of Detroit and began reading the feature article by our bishop, Adam Cardinal Maida about how we should be observing Lent. (As I write this we're in week 2.) She noticed that Cardinal Maida's meditation explained a great deal about, not only Lent, but also Wild Hogs, although I doubt he's seen the movie. So, thanks to the Cardinal (I've actually lifted some of his lines), here are some of the many parallels, and reminders of how important this season is.

1. To begin his article on Lent, the Cardinal quotes Hosea 2:16-17 that speaks of the Children of Israel, and compares it to our Lenten experience. God through the prophet declares:
"I will allure her; I will lead her into the desert and speak to her heart...She shall respond there, as in the day of her youth..."
In Wild Hogs, our four "mild hogs" are led by the filmmakers out into their own wilderness, in an effort to regain their youth.

2. For Lent we voluntarily give up things on which we've relied, we turn our focus on others instead of ourselves, and in so doing confront our fears.

In the movie the four friends give up their cell phones and many of life's conveniences, learn to focus on each other, and confront the fears that a road trip always brings, whether it's rain, bird dung, gay cops, no gas, no water, or mean bikers.

3. During Lent we enter a spiritual desert where we are removed from all the normal noise and distractions that can so easily prevent us from being available to God and others.

In the movie, the Wild Hogs enter a wilderness that removes them from their normal noisy lives and distractions that had prevented them from being available to others they way they should.

4. Lent takes us to a place where we are put in new surroundings and see new horizons. Lent broadens our lives and gives us a deeper understanding of who we are in the world.

Like all road trips, the Wild Hogs are introduced to new surroundings, new horizons and situations. The broadening Western landscapes we see in the film metaphors the broadening of the Wild Hogs' lives and the new vision they gain about who they are in relationship to the world.

5. Lent, through alms giving and prayer, is suppose to force us to think of others, and not so much about ourselves.

The Wild Hogs are forced to give of themselves to their friends, and the townsfolk of Madrid, and be willing to sacrifice themselves for each other and what is right.

6. Lent is a critical formation time with testing, trials, and temptations, just as the Children of Israel and Jesus were both formed through their wilderness experiences.

For the Wild Hogs, their road trip is a time for formation with temptations, trials, and lessons learned.

7. Lent is a time when we rekindle our loving communion with God. In short, the desert becomes a place of "romance."

For the Wild Hogs, riding through the countryside rekindles their friendship with each other, for two of them rekindles their love for their wives, and creates, literally, a romance for the Dudley.

8. Jesus' Lenten experience during his 40 days in the wilderness was where he came to terms with how he would use his power. It was a place of testing or temptation, a place of struggle and purification.

During their road trip, our Wild Hogs, came to terms with how they should use their power and influence to help each other and the people around them. It was a time of testing or temptation, and a time of struggle and purification.

9. Lent, can be about coming to terms with our fears, and knowing how to face them. Oft times during Lent, or other times of testing, we are strengthened so that our everyday frustrations are easier to handle because they're put into the perspective of larger and more significant concerns.

The Wild Hogs, came to terms about the fears in their life, and learned better how to handle their everyday frustrations. Doug learns to have fun (which turns his wife on...regaining his youth), Bobby takes the pants-of-the-family back from his wife who is glad to give them up, Dudley learns to talk-to and court a woman, and Woody confesses his false bravado.

10. Alone in the desert of lent, we come to appreciate the gift and blessing companionship and our need for each other.

Our WILD HOGS, in their desert, come to appreciate the gift and blessing of each other.

11. During lent we fast, and thus identify with the hungry and poor. Fasting also helps us to better appreciate the common grace of the food we eat the rest of the year; and fasting allows us to better appreciate the blessing and our connection with our community and the universe.

In the Wild Hogs, our four-some run out of gas, and soon they are without water, in the hot desert. When they enter the town of Madrid, their entry a local diner in a mad rush for a drink of water, something the community and the universe of nature can provide.

12. Lent also teaches us humility, our need for confession, and encourages us to remove the mask of self-reliance, and become once again our authentic self.

In Wild Hogs each of the guys has a moment where, they confess their short-comings to someone they love and remove their mask of pride. Doug calls his wife and confesses that he's learned the importance of having fun, again. Dudley tells Maggie, before they get serious, that he's not a real biker. Bobby tells his wife he loves her and he's not going to be a wimp anymore. And the most dramatic of the four is Woody's confession that he's been lying to his friends about his wife (who left him), his business (he's bankrupt), and what he did to get the Harley Sportser back from the Del Fuegos, the mean biker gang. Out of Woody's confession, the group decides to do penance, and confront the Del Fuegos who have been terrorizing Madrid. Their courage to not be afraid of what is right recruits the entire down...and even persuades Peter Fonda to walk-on from Easy Rider and set the world straight, again.

All of that then leads us to the story's true moral premise:

Avoiding the wilderness and ignoring our fears
leads to insecurity and stress; but
Venturing into the wilderness and confronting our fears
leads to confidence and peace.


Have a rewarding Lent.

P.S. Gus Lloyd enjoyed the movie because twice a year he and a few buddies rent Harley's and go for a week-end road trip. "This movie is my life," he laughs.

Although I don't ride, I liked the movie because I spent 5 years as creative director of the annual Harley-Davidson dealer training conference (HD University), and spend a lot of time around bikes at rallies and in stores. I came to appreciate a good deal of the Harley culture, but never took up riding because to Harley, my brain was more valuable to them, when it was inside my head.

Thursday, March 1, 2007

AMAZING GRACE (2006)

Directed by: Michael Apted

Written by: Steven Knight

Study Guide by Walden Media

Starring
IOAN GRUFFUDD - William Wilberforce
BENEDICT CUMBERBATCH - Pitt the Younger (Prime Minister)
NICHOLAS FARRELL - Henry Thornton
SYLVESTRA LE TOUZEL - Marianne Thornton
ALBERT FINNEY - John Newton
MICHAEL GAMBON - Lord Charles Fox
ROMOLA GARAI - Barbara Wilberforce
GEORGIE GLEN - Hannah More
TOBY JONES - Duke of Clarence
YOUSSOU N'DOUR - Oloudaqh Equiano
RUFUS SEWELL - Thomas Clarkson


"Amazing Grace" is the story of philanthropist William Wilberforce's 20-year British political career to raise the salience of slavery and its immorality. When pure debate in Parliament made little progress, Wilberforce's anti-slavery coalition takes the issue to the people with books, news reports, protests, party tricks, medallions, speeches, song and petitions. His task was immense because slavery was an important part of Britain's economy. Money, not ethics, drove the British colony system.

Elected to Parliament at a young age, Wilberforce, a fast-witted and persuasive speaker, suddenly experiences Christian conversion. He decides to leave government and become a churchman. But his friend, William Pitt (the younger) who will soon become the youngest Prime Minister in British history, challenges Wilberforce by asking him if he could better use his voice to praise God or to change the world. It doesn't take much to convince Wilberforce that the alternatives indeed can be the same thing.

In February 1807, after a 20-year struggle interrupted by Wilberforce's chronic illness and war, Parliament passes a bill that will abolish the slave trade. But slave ownership is grandfathered in, and slavery in the colonies is still legal. For 26 years Wilberforce continues to speak against slavery. Then, in 1833, Parliament outlaws all forms of slavery, throughout the British Empire. Three days later, Wilberforce dies. He lived to see his dream fulfilled.

Of a person's and a nation's conscience we might say that the moral premise of AMAZING GRACE could be stated like this:
Ambivalence and greed leads to injustice and slavery; but
Courage and generosity leads to justice and freedom.
But there's a better way to explain what this movie is really about and what kind of person Wilberforce's character suggests we be about today.

First, the name William Wilberforce could have been chosen by a master fiction writer who give names to his characters that reflect the essence of their soul. William means "protector," and in our story William is a protector of the disenfranchised; not just slaves, but prisoners, the poor, women, and children. And the name Wilberforce suggests a persevering force of the will that comes as second nature.

Second, Wilberforce wants to give up his fight many times. It is long, tedious, he has few followers, and he is chronically ill. He needs a muse, a soul mate, and so Henry and Marianne Thornton introduce him to his future wife -- like-minded, and equally witty (at least in the movie) -- Barbara Spooner.


The film's Moment of Grace comes when Wilberforce is ready to give up his battle. As he strolls through a garden with Barbara their banter is focused on finding something this disagree on, so they will have an excuse to not become the romantic item that the Thornton's envision. Every political or social topic is broached, and no matter how opinionated one or the other pretends, the other reluctantly agrees. Until Wilberforce off-handedly comments that it is time to stop talking about the abolition of slaves. He's tired and he sees no progress. To which Barbara, responds:
Well, then, we have found something to disagree about. I believe we should continue to talk about slavery.
Although they have found something to disagree on, it is this one thing that firmly unites them. To put an exclamation point on their discussion she says:
If there's a bad taste in your mouth, you spit it out; you don't swallow it.
And thus the story takes a turn, as Wilberforce, with Barbara as his muse, begins to think more cleverly about ways of turning parliament against slavery. Where before the moment of grace he was content with debating the issue within the confines of government, now, after Barbara's challenge to "spit out the distaste" he recruits public opinion with books of eyewitness accounts, tours of slave ships, medallions minted by the china maker Wedgwood, petitions, and the personal testimony of outsiders who have witnessed the gross atrocities committed against slaves throughout the British Empire. One of those witnesses comes from the diary account of former slave trader John Newton (wonderfully played by Finney), who is William's pastor. It is Newton, of course, that wrote the song Amazing Grace.

In this context the Moral Premise of this great film creates a challenge and motivation for all of us, even today as we face injustice of many kinds, including modern slavery.
Hiding evil by the darkness of ignorance leads to
injustice and a society's enslavement;
but
Revealing evil by the light of knowledge leads
to justice and society's freedom.
Such is the call to all of us who are concerned about what is wrong in our lives, our families, our communities, and our world.

Congratulations to Walden Media's excellent job creating the free down-loadable educational certified study guide.

Thursday, February 8, 2007

BABEL

BABEL (2006, 142 min)

Directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu

Written by Guillermo Arriaga

AMERICAN
Richard (Am Tourist) Brad Pitt
Susan (Am Tourist) Cate Blanchett
Debbie (blonde daughter) Elle Fanning
Mike (blonde son) Nathan Gamble
MEXICAN
Amelia (nanny) Adriana Barraza
Santiago (Amelia's nephew) Gael Garcia Bernal
JAPANESE
Yasujiro (Father) Koji Yakusho
Chieko (daughter) Rinko Kikuchi
Mitsu Yuko Murata
Kenji Satoshi Nikaido
MOROCCOAN
Abdullah (Father) Mustapha Rachidi
Ahmed (older son) Said Tarchani
Yussef (younger son) Boubker Ait El Caid
Anwar (helps Richard, rejects money) Mohamed Akhzam
Hassan (guide who sells rifle) Abdelkader Bara
Hassan's Wife Ehou Mama
Alarid Driss Roukhe
TIJUANA BORDER PATROL

Officer at Border Crossing Clifton Collins Jr.
John (border Patrol) Michael Pena



Although as humans we do not communicate very well,
"we all share the same spiritual spine." --
Alejandro Iñárritu

The movie Babel is a profound work about the human condition of not listening and the consequences of the misunderstanding that follows. The story of Babel in Genesis recounts man's effort to become equal with God and build a tower that reached to the heavens. God, angry at man's arrogance, confounded man's communication with different languages. This movie, however, suggests that it is not the barrier of language that creates humanity's lack of communication, but the barrier of not-listening and not loving.

Synopsis from the Production Notes

"Armed with a Winchester rifle, two Morrocan boys set out to look after their family’s herd of goats. In the silent echoes of the desert, they decide to test the rifle… but the bullet goes farther than they thought it would. In an instant, the lives of four separate groups of strangers on three different continents collide. Caught up in the rising tide of an accident that escalates beyond anyone’s control are a vacationing American couple, a rebellious deaf Japanese teenager and her father, and a Mexican nanny who, without permission, takes two American children across the border. None of these strangers will ever meet; in spite of the sudden, unlikely connection between them, they will all remain isolated due to their own inability to communicate meaningfully with anyone around them."

Fortunately, motion pictures like Babel, through the universality of pictures and sound, have a way of getting us to listen. In the words of the director, mankind has developed an "inability to love," and tragically, it is then suffering that forces love back upon us. It is in Babel that we once again learn something about how suffering brings meaning and purpose to life.

The film's production notes state:
The film tackles the unsettling contradiction that although we now live in a world where the latest, greatest technologies make it shockingly easy to communicate on a global level, people still feel largely isolated and apart from one another.
To me, this movie suggests that the Genesis story of Babel and the curse of many physical languages, is a metaphor for what sin had already done by psychologically blockading humankind's ability to listen and care for one another. Far worse than different languages, is the hardness of our heart to listen, and instead, erroneously assume things that are not true, and then, based on our imagination or lack of it, condemn.

Four Different Stories About One Thing

American tourists, Richard and Susan go to the Sahara desert of Morocco to escape their loneliness after losing a child. They have stopped listening to each other and feel resentment toward each other. Their disrespect results in a breakdown in emotional communication. It will take a tragedy to bring them back together.

Anwar and Yussef are the young Moroccan brothers from a Muslim home where Yussef, the younger, regularly peeps on his sister while she is undressing. Their father carelessly gives them a rifle to protect the goatherd, but they use a bus filled with American tourists for target practice, and Susan is critically shot. The family, especially the boys, have stopped listening to moral instruction, they disrespect moral laws, and consequently experience a breakdown in moral communication. It will take a tragedy to bring what's left of the family back together.

About the Moroccan brothers, Iñárritu remarks:
When values crumble nothing makes sense anymore; when a link is broken, it's not just the link that breaks, but the whole chain.
Yasujiro is a widower, in Toyko, Japan who has lost his wife to suicide. He is at a loss about how to physically connect with his daughter, Chieko, who through a combination of teenage rebellion and a lack of respect for her body, flails at sexual extremes to fulfill her yearning for affection. They are experiencing a breakdown in physical communication, made all the more obvious by Chieko's loss of hearing and speech. She is an attractive girl, also a deafmute, who disrespects her body. It is the tragedy of the mother's suicide and a compassionate detective that brings father and daughter back together on the verge of yet another suicide.

Amelia is the illegal alien nanny in San Diego caring for Richard and Susan's children, Mike and Debbie, while their parents are in Morocco. In order to attend her son's wedding south of Tijuana, she fails to find someone to care for the children. So, with the help of her careless nephew, they transport the children illegally into Mexico for the day and night's celebration. On the return trip, her drunk nephew, and her own lack of paperwork and passports, casts Amelia and the children hopelessly lost into the unforgiving desert. Amelia represents a breakdown in social communication where society's laws are disrespected.

In all of these overlapping stories there is a truth, and when that truth is not listened to, there are tragic consequences. What is that truth? It's what I call the moral premise. For Babel, in the movie's vernacular, the moral premise can be stated like this

Not listening leads to becoming profoundly lost and confused; but
Listening leads to deep connection and understanding.
In this statement of the moral premise the concept of "not listening" is not a passivity or deafness to the spoken word. It's an arrogance that cuddles prejudice and assumption. Certainly the border guard who arrests Amelia in the desert hears her words, and perhaps could even repeat them. But he doesn't listen. Like some dangerous criminal he handcuffs her, and traumatizes her to the point of confusion, which hinders her ability to even follow her footsteps through the sand back to where the children lie unattended. The border guard not listening further confuses Amelia and reinforces the profound loss of the situation.

On the other hand, the concept of "listening" has little to do with understanding the actual words being spoken, yet has everything to do with compassion and understanding. When Susan lies in excruciating and never-ending pain on the dirt floor of the Moroccan hut, it is an old woman, who can't understand a word of what she says, who relives her pain with a smoke pipe that kills her pain and helps her to relax. The old woman's action creates a deep connection and understanding with Susan.

The number of ways that the story explores how the lack of listening and a lack of love leads to loneliness, estrangement and chaos are numerous.
  • Chieko, the Japanese daughter, rejects her father's willingness to show her affection, and she's "deaf" to his need for her affection. Her decision to not listen, regardless of her deafness, leads to Chieko's experimentation with hallucinating drugs, willingness to participate in degrading sex, and her near suicide. At the end of the movie, her naked vulnerability is deafening.
  • Along with Chieko's story she does not listen to the authority of the volleyball referee, the natural laws of body or society's laws about drugs, the detective's need for information, or her body's reaction to her mind's willingness to expose herself to danger.
  • Richard and Susan, escaped to the desert because of the desert in their relationship after the loss of their child. Had they been true listeners and loving companions to each other, the trip to the desert would not have been necessary, and their children back home would not have been endangered by Amelia carelessly taking them across the border.
  • Along with Richard's story, he does not listen to the pleas of the other tourist's for their safety, nor do they listen to his need for companionship and assistance. Had they listened to each other the bus could have proceeded to a nearby community, from where greater help could have been sent. Neither he nor the embassy communicate very well over the phone, and he fails to understand why he can't get help right away. And most profoundly, when he talks to Amelia by phone about her son's wedding, he is as deaf as she is to him.
  • Yussef, the younger of the two Moroccan brothers, rejects the moral reminders of his brother about not peeping at their older sister as she undresses, and he disrespects the life and property of others when he uses a tourist bus for target practice. His father, Abdullah, does not listen to the laws of his land or religion as he leads his two sons on a futile escape from the police who are closing in. The result is the older son's death from a rain of bullets when the police start to shoot before asking the father and boys to give themselves up. The police's lack of listening and their quick triggers cause the death of Ahmed
  • Amelia's illegal status in the U.S. reveals how she does not listen to society's laws, and her unreliable and reckless nephew has not listened to his body's tolerance for alcohol, nor does he listen to the border crossing agent, nor does he listen to Amelia's repeated demands to drive safer and slower. Amelia is ultimately deported and loses the life in the U.S. that she had made for herself, and the children lose a loving Nanny.
  • Amelia's story also highlights the U.S. dilemma of not listening to the many people in Mexico who struggle to make a decent living out of near nothingness. It may be illegal for Mexicans to work in the U.S. without a permit, but the difficulty of getting those permits also creates situations similar to Amelia's. The Catholic bishops have made the point many times that the border should be more open, for the sake of those that are poor; and the United States should be more generous with its wealth.
Resolutions

While Babel doesn't allow the various story lines to be fully resolved by the story's end, we are left with the knowledge that each of the various stories' protagonists have learned that listening and respect are gateways to connections and love.

We have also learned through this movie, as in many others, as well as real life, that tragedy and suffering have a grand purpose of reducing human arrogance, deafness, and prejudice to the point where compassion, listening, and love are forced into the open as Richard drops his own interests and cares for his wife, as Yussef gives himself up to die even for the life of his innocent brother, as Chieko allows her father to take her hand and show her the beginning of the affection that they both so desperately need, and as Amelia's son comes to the border crossing to take his estranged mother home, where we know there is a widower who will love her.

One of Many Moments of Grace

I think the most poignant moment in the film occurs when Susan, unable to move on the dirt floor of the village home, tells Richard she has wet her pants, but that she has to pee again. In some respects it is a hopeful sign—her body has not given up the fight. It is still functioning. But here she lays, bloody and broken in a desperate, lonely, and desolate place. Nearby sits Anwar guarding the door to the outside. He has listened from the beginning to Richard and Susan's pain and he has been their loving servant in their plight. Richard asks Anwar for a pan, which Anwar produces. He then leaves to give them privacy. Struggling to pull down her underwear and lift her awkwardly up to use the pan, they embrace out of necessity to perform the human act. And in that embrace, of embarrassment and pain, dirt and dependence — they kiss, passionately, forgivingly. It is the suffering of their life, even the loss of the child, this wilderness experience that re-forges their love and compassion for one another.

Modernity is no Replacement for Marriage

Finally, there are a pair of scenes, 88 minutes apart, that say something strikingly important about modernity and marriage. The first is about the relationship between our ability to listen and modernity. Recall, again the scene at about 1 hr 54 min where Richard struggles to help Susan pull down her urine soaked underwear so she can urinate in a dirty pan in the middle of a dirt-floored hut on the edge of nowhere. Note that Richard could have told her that she didn't need to use a pan, why bother, she had already wet her pants once, do it again. But out of love, out of their struggle, out of her sickness, and out of their deplorable situation, together, they valiantly fight for a sense of dignity that only marriage brings. And in that heroic effort, together, they rediscover a connection and a true, passionate love. Now, recall a similar sequence in the movie 88 minutes earlier with the opposite effect. In this scene, Chieko, in the center of technologically urban Japan and a well-appointed club's bathroom, removes her panties -- not to urinate -- but to be provocative and to attract the illicit affection of a boy. Chieko's action does not result in connection and love, but isolation, alienation, and dread. These two scenes, while on opposite sides of the globe, one urban the other desert, one message is clear:
Modernity, money, and technology are no warrantor of connection and love. Better to be poor on the edge of the wilderness -- and listen.
The second message of these two scenes reinforces the sacredness of marriage in the way the scenes are presented and filmed. First, Chieko wears a provocative short shirt, but Susan is always modestly dressed. Two, we see Chieko's immoral blatancy, but Susan's dignity and decorum are protected. And three, while Chieko's undressing is done alone with the intent of fornication, Susan's undressing is with Richard's help within the bonds of marriage.

In all these ways here is what the movie Babel is really about:
Not listening leads to loss, confusion, and prejudice; but
Listening leads to connection, understanding, and love.

Do you want to know more about how movies like Finding Forrester connect with audiences? You can get more out of the movies you watch if you understand how good stories are constructed. The Moral Premise: Harnessing Virtue and Vice for Box Office Success is a book that will explain it to you, and make watching movies more enjoyable. Order it at the link above and the author of the book and this blog will be happy to autograph it for you. 

Sunday, January 28, 2007

LITTLE MISS SUNSHINE

Little Miss Sunshine(2006, R, 101 min.)

Directed
by Jonathan Dayton &
Valerie Faris
Written by Michael Arndt

Abigail Breslin...Olive

Greg Kinnear...Richard
Paul Dano...Dwayne
Alan Arkin...Grandpa
Toni Collette...Sheryl
Steve Carell...Frank


Little Miss Sunshine is the deservedly R-rated, road-trip movie of the Hoovers, a dysfunctional family, as they take their homely and plumb, 7-year-old Olive from their New Mexico home to a "Little Miss" beauty pageant in California. The story asks the question: What is a "winner" and what is a "loser."

This is not a movie I would recommend for purposes of entertainment because of the vulgarity, and general dysfunctional skewness. It's not "family" entertainment, although it may be about a more typical American family than I'm willing admit. But it is a film that can ironically play a role in helping to promote vitreous moral values. The movie was made for about $8M, and as of this writing has grossed about $60M. It has also garnered a good many awards, with 4 Academy nominations, including Best Picture. Certainly this movie connects with a good many people in America. So, I offer these observations about the film's moral premise.

THE CHARACTERS

The drama and comedy come from the desperately different and unattainable goals each of the main character has inappropriately latched onto. In their unique ways, each is a "looser" as the world would define it—none are at the top of their chosen games, and each could easily vie for last place.

OLIVE dreams of being a beauty queen, although she has little talent, and a rotund body. She repeatedly watches beauty pageants on a DVD, and practices being surprised at winning. We are told she rehearses her talent that Grandpa has taught her. Although, no one has seen her "talent," which is saved for the film's climax. Happenstance puts her into the final running of a distant once-in-a-life-time little miss pageant 2 days drive away, and circumstances force the entire clan into a yellow VW bus for the trip.

RICHARD, the clan's father, dreams of being a motivational speaker with this "9-steps" that will supposedly take any loser and turn him or her into a winner. But Richard, unfortunately, has barely achieved Step 3, although he is bargaining for a book deal that he hopes will put him in the national limelight. Someone should tell him that they throw "lime" on corpses.

DWAYNE, is the disgruntled 15-year old, who reads Nietzsche, says he hates everyone, and has taken a vow of silence until he can get in the Air Force Academy and learn to fly jets.

GRANDPA, is the vulgar, self-proclaimed playboy, with a heroin habit and Nazi bullets hidden in his body. He encourages Dwayne to bed as many women as he can, and fancies himself as the loving role model and pageant talent coach for Olive. We can't wait to see what Grandpa has taught Olive. On second thought, you can wait -- a life time.

SHERYL, is the stressed out mom who smokes in secret. Because movies have no smell, this works. Sheryl's goal is for the family to love each other and for her and Richard to have a normal married relationship. This goal is actually one that is worth not only rooting for, but is possible. In fact, Sheryl's goal (and character) is the only one that is not quirky, and perhaps for good reason.

Who's left? Oh, yeah, how could we forget UNCLE FRANK. And we shouldn't forget Uncle Frank, who is put under the care of his sister, Sheryl, while he emotionally recovers from an attempted wrist-slashing suicide. Why did he try to kill himself, asks Olive. Well, as Frank tries to explain to the innocent Olive, he fell in love with a male graduate student who ran off with his academic competitor and No. 2 Proust (prust) Scholar in America, who also beat out Frank for a Rockefeller Fellowship, and all of that resulted in Frank being fired from the university.
RICHARD: Who's the No. 1 Proust Scholar, Frank.
FRANK: I am, Richard.
PROUST VS. NIETZSCHE
Before we can discuss the Moments of Grace and the story's moral premise, it's necessary to set up the underlying conflict of values as articulated in the writings of French novelist and essayist Marcel Proust (d. 1922), and German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche (d. 1900). As mentioned above, Uncle Frank is a Proust scholar, and he's paired up with his Nietzsche reading, vow-of-silence nephew, Dwayne. This is not just a superficial pairing, because slivers of Proust and Nietzsche thinking about the meaning of suffering articulate what this move is really about.

The Nietzsche sliver used by LMS's writer Michael Arndt is the absence of a moral transcendence -- e.g. man must create his own moral standards. Nietzsche is the philosopher that announced "God is Dead," and on Dwayne's T-Shirt the inscription, which is slowly revealed, reads: "Jesus was Wrong." Nietzsche, it could be argued, is one of modernity's father's of moral relativism. He dies insane in 1900, only to be picked up, morphed, and canonized by Adolph Hitler for emboldening the Third Reich reign of terror. For Nietzsche, the suffering he experiences is mental. There is no happiness for Nietzsche, only the hope of a superman, eternal re-occurrence, and the will to power—the three themes, by the way, of Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey, one of my favorite films.

On the other hand, the philosophical sliver from Proust is that out of a lifetime of suffering we can find happiness; or coming from another direction, it is the experiences of suffering throughout life that bring meaning and allow us to know happiness. Personally, for Proust the suffering was physical that forced him to spend the last three years of his life in a corked-lined bedroom writing his magnum opus—a seven volume novel translated variedly but most recently as In Search of Lost Time. It is perhaps the longest novel ever written, and some claim the best. Those that make a lifetime of its study are called Proust Scholars.

Dwayne and Frank, therefore, are like contrary but similarly lost souls who are the movie's Greek Choruses. They are like dueling philosophers, who on the end of a pier overlooking an unpredictable, deep and dark ocean, try to analyze the human condition and find meaning in man's sufferings.

When the movie begins each of the Hoover clan is unhappy, except for the hopeful Olive when she's invited to the pageant. The source of their sadness is the self-indulgent, moral relativism that dominates their lives. It is as if Dwayne's larger than life-size bed-sheet painting of Nietzsche that hangs on his bedroom wall, has brought a curse to the household, so that each member reeks with a passion to seek their own way regardless of anyone else's needs. And like Nietzsche, each character fails in their life's pursuit and falls into a suffering despair.

SPOILER'S FOLLOW

Sheryl's dream of a functional family is lost to her harried permissiveness.

Richard's deal for a book falls through, because he's a nobody.

Frank's lover, fellowship award, and job are lost, turning him to suicide.

Dwayne's goal of being a jet pilot crashes, when he discovers he's color blind.

Olive's dream of being a beauty queen is dashed by a lack of knowledge and talent

And Grandpa's goal of being Olive's hero and coach is cut short by death from an overdose.

Each of these failures has its root in Nietzsche's claim that there is no transcendent morality, although we can be called to achieve "superman" status even as each of us finds their own moral way. Dwayne hates his self-described "hell" of waiting to get through high school. He says to Frank at the end of the pier:
DWAYNE: You know what? Fuck beauty contests. Life is one fucking beauty contest after another. School, then college, then work. Fuck that. And fuck the Air Force Academy. If I want to fly, I'll find a way to fly. You do what you love, and fuck the rest.
But, of course, it is exactly that worldview that has catapulted Dwayne and the family into their personal and social dysfunctions and sadness.

On the other hand, we find this sliver of Proust's thinking, perhaps selectively plucked from those seven volumes (which I have not read), that speaks of virtue and some hope, and is, quite frankly and perhaps inadvertently, in keeping with Judea-Christian thinking:
Out of life's suffering comes the meaning of life and happiness.
It is as if this concept slowly invades the family along with Frank's invasion. Although Frank may be a Proust scholar he obviously hasn't learned this little tidbit of truth. Perhaps he needed to be cooped up with a Nietzsche scholar to understand Proust by comparison. (So much for study in the Proust ghetto.)

Each of our characters has their moment of grace, where they are confronted by that Proust truth, and upon it they must each choose. And it is because the consequences of those choices aligns with our perception of reality, that grounds this film's popularity. These are extreme characters, but they experience reality as we know it is, regardless of the political or social ideology of how we think reality should be. In other words, regardless of our moral relativism, natural law is still boss, and this movie reinforces that truth in an entertaining and arresting way.

THE MORAL PREMISE

While we might argue that Olive is the story's protagonist, she is only the protagonist by virtue of providing the story's physical motivation of getting her to the pageant in time for registration. (Ticking clocks do work -- and wonderfully in this movie.) But Little Miss Sunshine, I will argue, has six protagonists and each has a Moment of Grace upon which their character's plight swings.

At 31 minutes into the story, the VW's clutch fails and the only way to get to the pageant on time is for everyone to get out and push until the van gets up to a third-gear speed -- and then one-by-one, jump into the van via the side door. The broken-down van brings suffering, and out of that suffering everyone puts aside their personal disgruntledness, gets out and pushes, then jumps or are pulled in (no stunt doubles here), and off the van goes down "Carefree Hwy." The result is glee, happiness, and satisfaction...for a while at least, until selfishness sets back in. But the experience points the whole family down the right road, literally and figuratively. Now that they've learned something together, it's time for each to deal with their personal issues one-on-one and make a choice about the moral premise.

Before we look at the individual MOG's let's decipher the moral premise. Here are some possible ways to state the moral premise for this film based on the conflict of values that Proust (via Frank) and Nietzsche (via Dwayne) bring to the story.

Doing what I want and ignoring the needs of others
leads to dread; but

Doing what others need, putting aside my needs
leads to happiness.


Or, put another way:

Rejection of personal suffering
leads to confusion and sadness; but

The embrace of personal suffering
leads to purpose and happiness.


Or:
Defining success as the attainment of power
leads to sadness; but

Defining success as serving others
leads to happiness.
Or put simply:

Pride leads to failure and sadness; but
Humility leads to success and happiness.

Or, in the movie's vernacular:

Expecting others to alleviate our suffering
leads to losing; but

Alleviating the suffering of others
leads to winning.
MOMENTS OF GRACE

Now, let's look at the moments of grace for each character, to understand how the movie consistently applies the above true moral premise.

Richard's moment of grace is when Stan Grossman tells him (twice) that there is no book deal, because nobody knows who Richard is. Richards is a nobody. Up to this time Richard expected Stan Grossman to provide Richard with prestige and power. When Grossman says no, Richard takes it badly, and Sheryl is also gravely disappointed in putting her trust in Richard's dream as well. But Richard embraces the moral premise's truth and dedicates himself all the more to getting Olive to the pageant on time. Sheryl, too, follows Richard's lead, and their decision adds to the healing of their relationship. Richard could have rejected the moral premise, and instead of taking off at night to seek his dream and Stan Grossman, Richard could have sacrificed Olive's need and used the family's travel time during the day to try to get his book deal back on track. Richard is determined to persevere in his dream, but for now he puts it aside to serve the needs of Olive.

Grandpa's first moment of grace comes after Richard first rejection by Grossman. Richard, mad, depressed, and after a short argument with Sheryl, gets back in the van and continues to drive. After Dwayne discovers that Olive isn't with them, they go back and pick her up. Then, as they continue to drive, Grandpa comes forward, kneels besides Richard and says to him, with his arm around him as he drives:
GRANDPA: Richard...whatever happens. You tried to do something on your own, which is more than most people would ever do, and I include myself in that category. You took a big chance. It took guts and I'm proud of you.
This is a starling moment for Grandpa, who has been so self-serving up to this point, except for encouraging Olive. This moment on his knees (of humility), and his enthusiasm for pushing the van (selflessness), reveals that down deep he loves his family, and his happiness and virtuous pride comes out of Richard and Sheryl's suffering. It is a moment that also helps Sheryl to heal in her relationship with Richard.

Frank's moment of grace occurs just before the movie begins, as soon as his sister, Sheryl, takes him in. We might say that when he was rejected by so many situations in his lifem, he rejected the moral premise and decided to following the path to sadness, dread, and death. But he's given a second chance, and this time he embraces the moral premise, and tries his best to make things go as smoothly as they can for Sheryl. He sees her suffering, and he's determined to do whatever he's asked to do, and then some to alleviate her suffering. At the beginning of the movie he is definitely that quintessential loser. But by movie's end he's proving himself more and more to be a winner in the eyes of the family.

Grandpa's second moment of grace occurs during the family's first night in a motel. After supposedly coaching Olive on her talent competition and tucking her in bed he goes into the bathroom, locks the door, and snorts some heroin. The next morning, Olive announces to her family that Grandpa won't wake up. At the hospital the family is told Grandpa died. Grandpa chooses the dark side of the moral premise and tries to alleviate his loser mentality with heroin. It's a selfish act. There was much he could have done to help others, and he was happy when helping to push the van, coach Olive, and encourage Richard. But that wasn't enough for him, and his life ends in tragedy. His family, rallies, however, much as they did when the van's clutch broke. They steal his body out a hospital window, into the back the van for the morning drive to the pageant, where they find a funeral home to take care of Grandpa's remains. In the suffering of Grandpa's death, the family again puts aside their selfish tendencies, and words together for the good of another (e.g. "stealing" Grandpa's remains from an uncaring hospital and a rude bereavement counselor, and helping Olive get to the pageant on time.)

Dwayne's moment of grace comes in the van when Olive gives him an eye-test. When she gets to the color-blindness test, he flunks it. He doesn't know what that means, until Frank tells him he can't fly jets if he's colorblind. Dwayne loses it, and threatens to knock a
hole in the van's roof or sidewall from his sudden distress. Richard pulls over the van and stops, and Dwayne bolts out of the van and down a hill into a barren field, and for the first time breaks his vow of silence. He lands on the ground and yells his distress. Above him on the side of the hill is the van, and his family standing in a row, and above them is the blue beyond. I'm sure the filmmakers were hoping for a jet contrail to appear. It would have been perfect. (Wait, maybe that's exactly what is in the blue sky behind them?!) Sheryl comes down the hill to comfort him and try to get him back in the van. But Dwayne, fully embracing the selfish side of the moral premise proclaims how he hates the family for a whole litany of reasons and how he's not ever getting back in the van. All is lost, it seems, and they may leave him there, in the wilderness, of his own choosing. (Nietzsche would be proud.) But Olive ventures down the steep incline to talk to Dwayne. She kneels next to him. (Kneeling could become a visual motif of this movie.) Silence. And then -- simply puts her arm around him and rests her head on his shoulder. They don't move for a while, and then Dwayne, says "OK, let's go." They walk up the hill, and Dwayne speaks clearly through tears of sadness:
DWAYNE: I apologize for the things I said. I was upset. I didn't really them.
And in so doing, Dwayne thinks of his sister, and the others, and embraces the truth of the moral premise. (Amazing what the act of kneeling can do and mean.)

It might be noted, that in the previous sequence, Dwayne was beginning to see the needs of others as more important. In the hospital waiting room, after the family learns of Grandpa's passing, he writes a note to Olive, "Go hug Mom." Olive does. Now, Olive follows Dwayne's advice again, and hugs him. No words are spoken. My wife was reminded of Saint Francis of Assisi's commission to his companions, "Go and preach the Gospel everywhere, and if necessary, use words." (Although, I think following St. Francis DeSale's tactics of chasing after people and yelling the Gospel at them in a loud voice, can also have a positive effect. In DeSale's situation it helped to convert most of Southern France.)

Sheryl's moment of grace seems to be every time she makes a decision to help the family attain its goals. When Richard is distraught over losing the book deal she finally gets back in the van, but does so, for Olive's sake. When Richard decides to steal Grandpa's body from the hospital, she hesitates, and then pitches in. She's thinking, it's good for Grandpa and for Olive, and she's supporting her husband's need to persevere and be a winner, as newly defined by Grandpa when he tells Richard he's proud of Richard for trying what others would not.

Finally, Olive's moment of grace comes at the end of the movie when she has a chance of backing out of the contest when she recognizes, as well as the rest of her family, that to go on stage and do anything would be humiliating at best. She's not beauty queen material—meaning she doesn't have the external beauty or talent that the other little girls have. She is given the option to compete or walk out. She decides to go through with it, and the results are disastrous. She embarrasses nearly everyone by doing a mock, bump & grind, strip-tease to the tune her late Grandpa picked out titled: "She's a Super Freak." Not only is Grandpa repudiated for teaching her the routine, but the pageant organizer tries to get Olive off stage, to no avail, and then calls on Richard to drag his daughter off. But when Richard walks on stage to get Olive, he's so proud of her for her courage, it's as if Grandpa's words are being repeated:
GRANDPA: You tried to do something on your own, which is more than most people would ever do...You took a big chance. It took guts and I'm proud of you.
And so Richard begins to dance, mockingly, with his daughter, and soon, the whole family joins them on stage.

It is immaterial that they are escorted to the security office and told they can leave (without being arrested and charged) if they promise never again to enter Olive in a California beauty contest. To which Frank replies:
FRANK: I think we can live with that.
Now, there are at least two ways to read Olive's decision to compete, and they both reinforce the moral premise. If we read it as her pride wanting to do her own selfish thing, we see it ending in near catastrophe as a competitor. She doesn't just lose the contest, she's nearly jailed. She has tested the negative side of the moral premise and it holds true.

But the other way to read her decision is this: She decides to compete because the rest of her family have sacrificed so much to give her this chance, and she wants to do it, selflessly, for them. After all, she promised her Dad that she was going to win, and then she dedicates the dance to her Grandpa for his love and encouragement, albeit a bit skewed. By competing, regardless of the odds, she fulfills the words of virtuous pride that Grandpa said to Richard by trying something most people never do.

But there is a more important aspect of the ending that my writing partner, Bill Wiitala, pointed out. Olive's bump-'n-grind is done out of an innocent heart for the sake of her family who have sacrificed so much for her. She and her family realize that the "beauty contest" that IS worth competing in, is one of selflessness, sacrifice, and suffering. The "beauty contest" that is of value is one of inner beauty and love. If Olive is going to suffer embarrassment, then the whole family will share in her suffering and lift her up. Opposing this concept is the importance of external beauty, a fake and put-on beauty, attended to by pushy stage-moms, sprayed on tans, fake smiles, and jaded attitudes. What the mothers of the little miss competitors hold up as important will be celebrated later in life by the biker dudes in adult strip clubs. So, there is this eloquent irony at the movie's end where Olive's bump-'n-grind satirizes what the little miss pageant is "really" about. It's a movie moment where a "strip-tease" means just the opposite of physical seduction. It is, in fact, a seduction of the inner heart.

ALL WINNERS

In many ways Little Miss Sunshine is a love story between father and daughter, and how the whole family learns to honor that love by sacrificing themselves for that love's endearment. They all start out as losers, but by movie's end, and because of the dysfunction and suffering, have put aside their selfish desires and replaced them with the interest of others. In that way the movies ends with the Hoover family being all winners, happy, and a bit less dysfunctional.

Do you want to know more about how movies connect with audiences? You can get more out of the movies you watch if you understand how good stories are constructed. The Moral Premise: Harnessing Virtue and Vice for Box Office Success is a book that will explain it to you, and make watching movies more enjoyable. Order it at the link above and the author of the book and this blog will be happy to autograph it for you.

Friday, January 26, 2007

THE ILLUSIONIST

The Illusionist (2006)
Directed & Written by Neil Burger
Steven Millhauser (short story)

STARRING:
Edward Norton - Eisenheim
Paul Giamatti - Inspector Uhl
Jessica Biel - Sophie
Rufus Sewell - Crown Prince Leopold


This is the story of Eisenheim (Norton), a magician in 1900 Vienna, who uses his abilities to secure the love of Sophie (Biel) a woman far above his social standing. It is his and her physical goals from childhood to go off together, or in her vernacular, she asks of him: "Make me disappear."

As a young teen aristocrat, she is forcibly taken away from Eisenheim, when he can't make her disappear from the grown-ups that would control her life. His curse? He's the son of a cabinetmaker, a peasant boy who has a gift for slight-of-hand, magic and supernatural faith. He leaves to travel the world and gain power through his gift. When he returns, now as an acclaimed illusionist, she re-enters his life unexpectedly, and just as disheartening is her engagement to the villainous Austrian Crown Prince Leopold whom she does not love, and who treats her, and those that work for him, harshly. The story is told from the point of view of Vienna's chief police inspector, whose career loyalty is to the crown, but being an amateur magician, he has the greatest respect for Eisenheim. That is what the story is about on a physical level.

But what the story is REALLY about, on the psychological level, is this moral premise:
Faith in the supernatural leads to eternal life; but
Faith in scientific materialism (skepticism) leads to death.
At its very core, every scene and character of The Illusionist, is about the conflict of two opposing values:
  • faith in the spiritual world, and
  • faith in the material world.
As explained in my book The Moral Premise, successful movies are about only ONE thing, but that one thing is explored differently in each of the main characters. In The Illusionist, we have four main characters that represent the center, extremes, the middle ground of the debate of where power resides—in the materialistic realm or the spiritual realm. It is an age old question from the Greeks to modern day. But with the industrial revolution and the grand inventions of 100 years ago, the question was of particular interest in Europe, where this story takes place. Let's now look at our charaters and see how they interact with the moral premise.

EISENHEIM is the quintessential illusionist who represents the spiritual side of existence. He is like a priest who is endowed with the supernatural power to enact sacraments, bind or loose, judge the faithful and the skeptics, and rewarding each with eternal life or eternal death. Eternity, of course, has a great deal to do with time -- or perhaps the lack of it. Set Eisenheim up with the moral premise, at one performance he tells his audience:
I would like to continue with an examination of time. From the moment we enter this life we are in the flow of it. We measure it and we mock it, but we cannot defy it. We cannot even speed it up or slow it down. Or can we? Have we not each experienced the sensation that a beautiful moment seemed to pass to quickly, and wished that we could make it linger? Or felt time slow on a dull day, and wished that we could speed things up a bit?
His comments are a foreshadowing of his next more direct ascent to the spiritual meaning of life and death. In another performance with the Crown Prince's entourage in attendance, he bates his audience, and sends the movie reeling down an inevitable path:
I thought we might end this evening with a discussion of the soul. All the greatest religions speak of the soul's endurance beyond the end of life. So, what do you think it means to die? I need a volunteer from the audience -- someone not afraid of death.
And it is at this moment that we are introduced to the two characters that represent the extremes of the moral premise's application. It is, of course, two characters that are intertwined with each other, and who place Eisenheim between them.

Responding to Eisenheim's challenge, the CROWN PRINCE stands, as if to volunteer. But of course, as we will discover, he is afraid of both life and death—he is a quintessential skeptic. So he offers up his finance, SOPHIE, who we will discover is not afraid of life or death—she is the quintessential believer, especially in Eisenheim whom she knows to possess a special connection with what is really true.

Neil Burger, the writer and director tells us on his DVD commentary track:
The crown Prince is a complete skeptic and he doesn't want to admit there is any greater power than his own. The crown Prince can't stand anyone or thing that has a power greater than his own. He can't stand any kind of superstition or religion. It diminishes his own power.
Somewhere in between the skeptic Prince, and the magician-priest is Vienna's chief inspector, UHL. The movie is told from his perspective, as he tries to discover, for the audience, where the real power lies. Uhl, like the Prince, likes to have scientific explanation for everything, but he also enjoys mystery -- he is the head of investigations for the city. Uhl's perspective is how it is with the common man; and so the audience easily identifies with Uhl and his search for meaning and truth. As the story moves along we find Uhl moving toward spiritualism and at other times moving toward materialism. For us, he is always asking: "Can the sacramental powers of the priest-magician be explained or are we to take them on faith, a fiat, if you will?"

Leading up to a fateful Moment of Grace (MOG), Eisenheim is invited to a command performance. The Prince introduces Eisenheim and announcing to his audience a paraphrase of the moral premise by saying that Eisenheim...
...has reportedly sold his soul to the devil in exchange for holy power...Fear not, everything can and will be explained -- all mysteries penetrated.
And his audience claps in approval of scientific materialism.

MOMENTS OF GRACE

Eisenheim merges the steel of scientific materialism (the Prince's sword) with the power of spiritualism, an astonishing sword trick that challenges the Prince's divine right to rule both the country and Sophie's heart. The Prince is embarrassed in front of his friends, and comes upon his own MOG, choosing to embrace materialism and dismisses the supernatural. To some, Eisenheim has made a foolish choice to confront the Prince, but, just perhaps, Eisenheim has only played only the first of many face cards in his hand. Within moments the Prince whispers to the Inspector Uhl to get rid of Eisenheim.

But to fully engage the story, Eisenheim and Sophie also must come to their MOG.

After the command performance, late at night, Sophie comes to Eisenheim in secret and they proclaim their love to each other. He asks her to come away with him. But for her to leave the Prince for Eisenheim would be certain death for both of them. Will they succumb to the seduction of materialism and power (they have just made love), or will they give in to the mystery of their love and the supernatural lure of eternal live. He ponders the truth of the moral premise, and then comes upon his own Moment of Grace, and forces Sophie to hers as well.
EISENHEIM
Look at me. Do you truly want to leave with me?

Sophie raises up and with full awareness of the possible consequence of her answer.

SOPHIE
Yes. -- I do.
Her simple statement is like both the commitment of a bride during a wedding, and the Virgin's Mary's fiat to Gabriel. It is a simple, assured yes, but it reflects the deep faith she has in this worker of supposed miracles dispite the difficult road ahead. It is 48 minutes into a 90 minute movie. The MOG for the protagonist is usually in the middle.

From this moment on, Eisenheim's goal (to recapture his love with Sophie from childhood) is the same, but the method will be the grand illusion, not the parlor tricks. The grand illusion will involve grand misdirection and the full use of all his "sacramental" powers. As we will see, Sophie's childhood wish "make me disappear" now takes on a new twist. Because, recall, she is unafraid of death, and it is in eternity that time can be slowed in order to enjoy those moments of grace. Thus, it becomes Eisenheim's goal to usher the two of them into paradise.

Indeed Eisenheim does make Sophie disappear, (an homage to Romeo and Juliet) if only to make her reappear in several Marian-like apparitions. Like Mary's appearance, Sophie's purpose is to convinces the populace that the spiritual may be very real indeed, and not to accept the Prince's scientific materialism, dread, paranoia, and harshness it will bring.

It is the magician-priest who calls on the supernatural to persuade the populace that there is a spiritual side to our existence. As the populace begins to embrace that truth, the Prince's future is threatened, because the Prince's source of knowledge and power—scientific materialism—is threatened. To drive this home to the audience Burger drops us in on a Spiritualist leader who lectures a gathering. We fervor the old man proclaims:
With these spirits, these manifestation, Eisenheim has give us hard proof of the soul's immortality. The spirit has been reaffirmed in the face of modern scientific materialism. The work of spiritualism will evolve humanity to new moral earnestness....
And then one of Url's investigators finishes the leader's remarks in a report to Uhl:
...It is a revolutionary movement and we will turn the empire into a spiritual republic.
The mystery of the supernatural directly challenges scientific materialism, as does a burgeoning democracy challenges the emperor's successor.

By the way, in real life, it is the skeptic that takes his own life. No once chooses it but the skeptic himself.

Let me finish up with this comment from Burger on the DVD's commentary track.
The role of the magician is to remind us of the mystery of existence, and to inspire awe and wonder of that mystery. Something in the universe is more powerful than all man's achievements. Even if it is a trick, there's that one moment when we feel that the magician does have some kind of power that reminds us of what it's like to look at the night's sky and wonder what are we doing here, where do we come from, and where is all this going?
And that is what The Illusionist is really about:
Faith leads to eternal life; but
Skepticism leads to death.

Friday, January 19, 2007

WORLD TRADE CENTER

World Trade Center
(2006, Theatrical Docudrama, PG-13, 1 hr 59 min)

Directed by Oliver Stone

Written by Andrea Berloff
based on the true stories of John & Donna McLoughlin and William & Allison Jimeno

Starring:
Nicolas Cage (John)
Maria Bello (Donna)
Michael Pena (Will)
Maggie Gyllenhaal (Allison)
Michael Shannon (Karnes)


THE PHYSICAL STORY
World Trade Center is a docudrama about the survival and rescue of two New York Port Authority Cops, one a veteran Sergeant John McLoughlin (Nicolas Cage) and the other a rookie, William Jimeno (Michael Pena), who are caught under the rubble of the World Trade Center towers' collapse on September 11, 2001. The movie, is also about the emotional battle fought by their wives Donna McLoughlin (Maria Bello) and Allison Jimeno (Maggie Gyllenhaal), and the Marine that discovered them, Dave Karnes (Michael Shannon).

In short strokes the men go to work early on the morning of September 11, 2001 as police officers assigned to the Manhattan bus terminal, but soon are called to go downtown as part of a larger team to the Trade Center Towers to rescue survivors. After they arrive, the buildings collapse, entombing the men, most of which die. John and Will barely survive. After 18 and 24 hours respectfully, they are rescued, and are reunited with their wives and family, albeit after long medical recoveries. As the movie follows the men's journey toward death and then toward life, it also follows the women's journey toward dread and then hope.

THE PSYCHOLOGICAL STORY
While the physical elements of any story surrounding 9/11 are likely to be about harrowing physical events of heroes and victims, World Trade Center is substantially a psychological adventure. For most of the movie the physically active Nicolas Cage of movies such as Gone in 60 Seconds, National Treasure, and Ghost Rider—is buried is rubble and dust, that we see only part of his face; Michael Pena is similarly challenged with his character. We are left with their psychological wits, albeit enhanced with further building collapses, fireballs, death, and trauma. The women, in traversing their emotional journey at least can move about their homes and neighborhoods, but their nemesis is the dread that the husbands, to whom they have a strong bond, might be dead. The men in their hole, and the women in their homes — both seemingly trapped without recourse — battle for hope, life, and a return to the happiness they had but had taken for granted.

Depending on how you want to "read" the film, there are two moral premises. In broad storytelling terms, you have hateful villains and loving heroes that lead to a moral premise like this:
Hate leads to death; but
Love leads to life.
It is the hate of the terrorists and leads to the thousands of death that day; but it is the love of New Yorkers that rally and bring lives and the city back to life.

But as one of the movie's tag lines says this:
The World Saw Evil That Day. Two Men Saw Something Else.
That is a hint that this movie is about something more important still. I think this film is really about this MORAL PREMISE:
Taking the love of our family and country for granted
leads to death and despair; but

Not taking the love of our family and country for granted
leads to life and hope.

HOW THE MORAL PREMISE IS REVEALED
The first half of the film shows us what can happen when we take certain things for granted.

On a national scope we could conclude that until 9/11 the country took its freedom and safety for granted. America was not prepared for such an attack. It assumed that distance from its belligerent enterprises, and current level of intelligence gathering, had ensured safety. Indeed the movie begins with the Burke and Dunn song Only in America, which heralds America's overconfidence that:
Only in America, where we dream as big as we want to
We all get a chance, everybody gets to dance -- only in America
...all [we] want is everything
It is a song that bespeaks of our taking our freedom for granted.

We also see how individuals in America have taken their good lives for granted. The movie begins with John getting up from bed at 3:29 AM. He says nothing to his wife, Donna laying in bed next to him. As he gets up he doesn't even look at her. Although awake, she is turned away from him and does not speak or move. John dutifully prepares for work, looks in on his four sleeping children, then drives to Manhattan for work. In this small but significant way we see how John and Donna take each other for granted and do not savor the moments they have together. Later this scene is reprised with a different outcome, as both learn the importance of seizing important moments in their lives.

A montage introduces us to New York City's morning, which is like many others...until terror strikes when the first airliner flies into one of the World Trade Towers. Suddenly, dread strikes everyone, even the police force.

With fear and trepidation John is asked to lead a team to the disaster site to rescue survivors. It's a mission for which they've never trained. Like many law enforcement organizations across the country, they have taken for granted their safety and freedom, never imagining that this situation would ever occur.

Before they get to the building they're supposed to enter, the first tower collapses, and they're trapped in the rubble near an elevator shaft. Their predicament is made worse with a second and third building collapse, and the death of their comrades.

It seems to us and to John and Will that they too are destined to die.

In fact the rest of the country and the world have taken the radical Islamic threat for granted, assuming they could not attack the West successful, even though the history of the West's conflict with Islamic terrorism is hundreds of years old. We forget Europe and America's 30 year conflict with the Barbary Pirates of Algeria, Tunis, and Tripoli from 1785 to 1815, a 30 year period of piracy that saw U.S. citizens killed, taken hostage and the U.S. paying extortion to protect its shipping. A tactics that didn't work and wasn't solved until President Jefferson attempted and President Madison succeeded to engage America's fledging navy (right after the War of 1812) to sail to the Mediterranean and put an end to centuries old terrorism.

Despite this sort of history, America and New York City, as is much of the world are in a state of shock as we see with montages and interludes of cops in Wisconsin, an accounting firm in Connecticut, and people watching the events from around the world. The shock and feelings of helplessness and dread are the result of taking or safety for granted.

Through the first half of the story there is an acceptance of fate — a taking for granted that even when disaster strikes, there is little we can do to fix it, and we take our government for granted, rather than trying to fix things ourselves.

That is definitely the attitude of Donna McLoughlin, John's wife. Even after her husband is likely trapped in the rubble, she busies herself with household duties to take her minds off the tragedy, and more to the point, try not to get the children upset that somehow their father may be dead. She is play-acting at taking-for-granted, trying to act as if everything will be all right, or that others will handle the situation.

Allison, Will's wife, who is 5 months pregnant with their second child, is ill prepared emotionally. Will's new to the force and she, too, has taken for granted his safety. But now, she vomits.

That same attitude pervades the hole. Will and John talk about the waves of pain. Will asks John how long the internal bleeding takes to kill them. Both of them accept their fate, they take their situation for granted, and don't believe they can change anything.

THE MOMENT OF GRACE
53 min into the 1 hr. 59 min. story


It is at this point that Will makes a decision that alters their lives. Rather than taking their situation for granted and dying in the hole, he remembers the story of a little girl in Turkey who survived being trapped in an Earthquake's rubble for 4 days. He says to John: "If she can make it so can we." It is that moral decision by Will that changes the direction the movie is headed.

Looking beyond his immediate surroundings, Will sees a loose pipe that drips water near him. The drip of water is life. But when he can't pull the pipe close enough he lets the pipe slip, creating a loud noise that reverberates through the rubble pile. John hears it, and tells Will to keep it up. It will be a beacon to their rescuers. No longer are they taking their situation for granted.

At that moment John has a vision or dream of the time he and Donna discovered that they were pregnant with their first child. It is a special moment, and he does not fail to shower her with attention.

The next scene is back to real time. Donna and John's son (J.J.) challenges his mom to do something and not just stay around the house as if she didn't care. He challenges his mom not to take anything for granted, and to go to the city to look for John. The question is asked, "Why stay alive to come back to a routine?" The routine, here, substitutes for taking life for granted. After J.J. storms off, Donna laments to a friend, "I don't remember the last thing I said to John." She is sorry for taking John for granted, and not savoring her last moment with him.

The fourth time the story returns to the hole, guilt sets in for the men -- although the snapping of the pipe is a signal to the audience that these guys have hope. They begin to move past themselves and think of their families, verbally this time. Will blames himself for the death of their cohort nearby, and John takes the blame upon himself as the group leader. In the words of director, Oliver Stone, "They see how small and selfish they are." Selfishness here substitutes for taking others for granted.

Suddenly the third building implodes, and the rain of debris is so bad that they are sure they are going to die. John begins to yell out the Lords prayer at the top of his lungs. We hear the phrases "deliver us from evil" "forgive our trespasses" the clearest. John is not taking his salvation for granted. During that same moment Will is calling out for his family and little girl, Bianca.

When the threat passes, John has a vision of waking up like he did at the beginning of the movie, but this time, instead of taking Donna for granted, he turns over and pulls her into her arms. It is a vision or a memory (we don't know which) that gives John hope.

Earlier we met David Karnes, an accountant in Connecticut who upon seeing the tragedy on television, talks to his pastor and prayers about what he should do. Quickly he sets off for the city. And, now, we see David Karnes walking toward the field of rubble when others firefighters and police are being turned away. He will not take his country's freedom for granted.

Donna discovers John's woodworking, as if it was for the very first time. She lovingly touches the tools; and she envisions John working with J.J. showing him how to use a saw. She can't take his gifts or love for the family for granted. She has to stop complaining that in the middle of his kitchen-remodeling project, she has no cabinets in the kitchen.

In the hole Will has a vision of Jesus who holds out a bottle of water to him. Jesus says nothing, but we remember Jesus' words to the Samarian Women, "Whoever drinks the water I shall give will never thirst; the water I shall give will become in him a spring of water welling up to eternal life." (John 4:14) Will tells John he's seen a vision of Jesus "Jesus is telling us something. He's telling us to come home."

The first thought of that line might be in reference to coming home to heaven, but just a few minutes before little Bianca asks her mother Alison, "is Daddy coming home?" and afterwards in a vision John has, Donna is tilling him to get unstuck and home, the kids need you." to which John replies, "No, I need you." Home, here, is the one on earth, and Will is recharged with hope.

After Will is pulled to safety, it will take another 8 hours to get John out. While John waits he has a vision of Donna there in the hole with him, she's encouraging him to get unstuck and finish remodeling the kitchen. Will remembers cuddling with Alison and trying to decide what to call the new baby.
Both men had good marriages.
I don't think they would have survived if they had bad marriages.
—Oliver Stone
His first is on the hospital gurney when he first sees Donna he says:
You kept me alive.
Two years later at a picnic, John holds Donna close and says:
If she wasn't here I wouldn't be here.
Then, at the picnic, Will turns around and calls to a small child:
Olivia, you comin'?
And a very happy little girl runs to Will's arms and he lifts her up high with glee.

Finally, the film takes us to David Karnes who decides he's not returning to work, but instead signs up for two tours of duty to Iraq. He is not going to take our country's freedom for granted.

In all these ways the movie is really about the moral premise:
Taking the love of our family and country for granted
leads to death and despair; but

Not taking the love of our family and country for granted
leads to life and hope.