Discussion and analysis of screenplays, scripts, and story structure for filmmakers and novelists, based on the blogger's book: "THE MORAL PREMISE: Harnessing Virtue and Vice for Box Office Success".
Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Tuesday, November 22, 2016
Beats - Turning Points - Sequences - Pinch Points
One of my on-going challenges as a story consultant has been to clarify terminology and minimize the equivocation in terms. (Thus the recent post Protagonist vs. Hero with assistance from Chris Volger). Clarifying terms was a motivation behind writing the The Moral Premise regarding what others were calling various things like "the Controlling Idea," "Theme," "Premise," and so on.
The Story Diamond (link to PDF of Diamond) was not original with me, but I saw the opportunity of layering other story concepts onto it and thus demonstrating how the wide variety of terms used in our niche industry, are really all about the same thing.
So, this post is another attempt at that...with hopefully some nomenclature consistency. It was prompted by the last several posts by Michael Hauge over at StoryMastery.com. Michael has made the turn from calling every sequence and turning point a "beat" to differentiating between the different kind of beats as "turning points" and story "stages". This solves an on going problem. I would tell my clients that some beats are "moments" (a single scene) and others are "sequences" (numerous scenes.) Yet the connotation of "beats" still sounds instantaneous...which is confusing since half of the beats are not moments at all.
So, taking this hint from Michael, I offer up the following and the Story Diamond has been updated to reflect this subtle shift in labeling conventions.
As a further update, the 8 stages can also be called Mini-Movies, which reflects the ideas of Paul Gulino (Screenwriting: The Sequence Approach), and Chris Soth of ScreenwritingU.
Recall that our goal is to create an emotional roller coaster effect for our reader/audience. That end goal demands a regular (up and down) progress of scene sequences and turning points (or beats) or pattern over which we can apply our story elements and plot.
The latest PDF of the Story Diamond is HERE.
The latest PDF Annotated NOTES document for The Story Diamond is HERE.
Plus, the Sequences alternate with the Points, for a deeper symmetry and a satisfying roller coaster ride.
The Story Diamond (link to PDF of Diamond) was not original with me, but I saw the opportunity of layering other story concepts onto it and thus demonstrating how the wide variety of terms used in our niche industry, are really all about the same thing.
So, this post is another attempt at that...with hopefully some nomenclature consistency. It was prompted by the last several posts by Michael Hauge over at StoryMastery.com. Michael has made the turn from calling every sequence and turning point a "beat" to differentiating between the different kind of beats as "turning points" and story "stages". This solves an on going problem. I would tell my clients that some beats are "moments" (a single scene) and others are "sequences" (numerous scenes.) Yet the connotation of "beats" still sounds instantaneous...which is confusing since half of the beats are not moments at all.
So, taking this hint from Michael, I offer up the following and the Story Diamond has been updated to reflect this subtle shift in labeling conventions.
As a further update, the 8 stages can also be called Mini-Movies, which reflects the ideas of Paul Gulino (Screenwriting: The Sequence Approach), and Chris Soth of ScreenwritingU.
Recall that our goal is to create an emotional roller coaster effect for our reader/audience. That end goal demands a regular (up and down) progress of scene sequences and turning points (or beats) or pattern over which we can apply our story elements and plot.
The latest PDF of the Story Diamond is HERE.
The latest PDF Annotated NOTES document for The Story Diamond is HERE.
Symmetry
If we refer to the Climax of Act 3 as a turning point (which is clearly is in redemptive stories where the protagonist makes his/her biggest change) we then have a wonderfully symmetrical story system. There are 4 Turning Points, and 4 Pinch Points, and they alternate, helping to create the roller coaster effect we're after. MORE ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ROLLER COASTER AND STRUCTURE AT THESE POSTS.Plus, the Sequences alternate with the Points, for a deeper symmetry and a satisfying roller coaster ride.
- (Prologue)
- Sequence 1
- Pinch Point A (Inciting Incident)
- Sequence 2
- Turning Point 1 (Act 1 Climax)
- Sequence 3A
- Pinch Pint B
- Sequence 3B
- Turning Point 2 (MOG)
- Sequence 4A
- Pinch Point C
- Sequence 4B
- Turning Point 3 (Act 2 Climax)
- Sequence 5
- Pinch Point D (Final Incident)
- Sequence 6
- Turning Point 4 (Act 2 Climax)
- Denouement
Friday, November 11, 2016
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Hero vs. Protagonist
Thanks to Christopher Vogler for his contributions to this post.
What's the difference between a hero and protagonist; or for that matter the anti-hero, villain, antagonist, main character or POV character? Like many concepts it's easy to lapse into equivocation because of the varied way these terms are used.
While I have no serious issue with using "hero" and "protagonist" interchangeably, it can make sense to use them differently. Below are a few suggestions for all these terms.
An underlying assumption (and a big one) is that the audience has a working moral compass and knows what behaviors are to be rooted for or deplored. This may not work in a morally ambiguous universe, but for general audiences that comprise a cross section of society, a movie's popularity will correlate to natural law, which is a fair basis for moral certainty.
What's the difference between a hero and protagonist; or for that matter the anti-hero, villain, antagonist, main character or POV character? Like many concepts it's easy to lapse into equivocation because of the varied way these terms are used.
While I have no serious issue with using "hero" and "protagonist" interchangeably, it can make sense to use them differently. Below are a few suggestions for all these terms.
An underlying assumption (and a big one) is that the audience has a working moral compass and knows what behaviors are to be rooted for or deplored. This may not work in a morally ambiguous universe, but for general audiences that comprise a cross section of society, a movie's popularity will correlate to natural law, which is a fair basis for moral certainty.
MAIN (POV) CHARACTER...
...is the character with the most screen time. This may or may not be the hero, anti-hero, one of two kinds of protagonists, anti-hero, antagonist, or villain. It is almost always the Point of View (POV) character, or the perspective of the storyteller.
HERO... is the character that
- nearly epitomizes the virtues or strengths of the moral premise, but still
- is subtly flawed.
- will change (arc), but subtly and always in the same direction. The hero's values will not change direction or polarity, but at the Moment of Grace will get stronger and deeper.
- actively pursues a physical and visible goal that audience can root for.
- will be a good guy with desirable traits.
- may often give up his life to achieve the goal.
Example: Captain Miller in SAVING PRIVATE RYAN. See detailed post at link.
ANTI-HERO... is that character that:
- epitomizes the vices or weaknesses of the moral premise, and thus
- is significantly flawed.
- will change (arc), but subtly and always in the same direction. That is, the anti-hero's values will not change direction or polarity, but at the Moment of Grace will get stronger and deeper. This is the same as the HERO.
- actively pursues a physical and visible goal that audience can root for, just like the HERO.
- will be a good guy with undesirable traits
VILLAIN... is that character that:
- epitomizes the vices or weaknesses of the moral premise, and thus
- is significantly flawed
- will change (arc), but subtly and always more dark.
- actively attempts to prevent the hero or protagonist from reaching the goal.
- will always be the bad guy.
Example: Hans Gruber in DIE HARD
PROTAGONIST (Redemptive)... is that character that:
- at first, embraces vices or weaknesses of the moral premise, and is therefore,
- clearly flawed, but
- will change (arc) clearly toward the virtue or strengths of the moral premise.
- actively pursues a physical and visible goal that audience roots for.
- is usually a good guy in the end.
- and lives to see another day, even better.
PROTAGONIST (Tragic)... is that character that:
- at first, embraces vices or weaknesses of the moral premise, and is therefore
- clearly flawed, but
- will change (arc) clearly toward darker vices or greater weaknesses of the moral premise.
- actively pursues a physical and visible goal that audience roots against
- is usually a bad guy in the end.
Examples: Charles Foster Kane in CITIZEN KANE, and
Tony Soprano in THE SOPRANOS
Tony Soprano in THE SOPRANOS
Test Question: Do tragic protagonists always sit at table with a wine glass half-full, chin down, eyes up, and glare off screen camera right...."as if the answer to their dilemma were over there" (CV).
ANTAGONIST... is that character that:
- embraces either vices/weaknesses or (not both) virtues/strengths of the moral premise, and is therefore
- clearly flawed, or clearly virtuous,
- may or may not (arc) clearly toward the opposing value, but if arc occurs will be cogent with the moral premise
- actively opposes the physical and visible goal of the hero, anti-hero, or protagonist becoming the catalyst for change (arc) in the hero, anti-hero or protagonist.
- may be the good guy or the bad guy
Example: The Angels in "Touched By An Angel"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)